Talk:India Hotel/@comment-4357436-20120504201532/@comment-4935290-20120505063715

DarkMoomRising:

1. About the "clutter" in this page, just ignore everything after the first two tables and you will get the same thing you had before. But this is a wiki, if you know how to make the tables less "cluttered", please do, just don't remove data that someone can find usefull.

2. To me it doesn't make sense not having data about a building in its page so i had to open 3 or 4 pages to get the data about one building. I agree the graphs can be usefull but they are only the collection of all this data, the data can and imho must be repeated. And with the number of buildings increasing it is hard to include every building in one page and a lot of buildings don't mean anything to each user (for example christmas buildings don't mean anything to me, I can't have them because I started playing in February). So you end up with gigantic graphs that most users will have a hard time finding the buildings that matter to them. But this is a wiki, if you want to make the graphs, go ahead.

3. About including energy and roads, imho it doesn't make sense now. The costs and tiles used for energy depend heavily on which kind of generators you have, the combinations are almost endless so any attempt to predict is futile imho. Roads can be destroyed after placing the building, many users do that in at least some buildings, including me. But this is a wiki, if you want to make the graphs, go ahead.

4. Collections times are probably the thing that changes the most from one user to another. The graphs assumed one collection each 4 hours, to me it's unrealistic, almost no one will collect this way. Even my own pattern of collections is different each day, so i think it's impossible to make one graph to represent all that. What i do is to analyze separately quick collections (less than one hour), medium collections (1 to 8 hours) and long collections (more than 8 hours). But this is another discution. But this is a wiki, if you want to make the graphs, go ahead.

But that's just me :-)